transparency
if our service is real, our own score should climb week over week. it doesn't yet. that's the point of this page: you watch us drag aimentionsyou.com from 0/40 to something useful, in public, with receipts.
same 10 buyer-intent prompts × 4 engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini), every monday at 09:00 CET. raw csv published below. methodology frozen so week-over-week diffs are honest.
this week
we're invisible today. let's fix it in public.
visibility score
cells where ChatGPT/Claude/Perplexity/Gemini named us or cited a URL we own.
top 3 brands cited instead
First Page Sage + Ahrefs Brand Radar trailing in 5+ cells each.
why 0/40?
weekly log
every monday at 09:00 CET, one new row. raw CSVs linked. weekly post explains what moved and what didn't.
| week | score | top 3 competitors cited | queries tested | weekly post |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
week 1
2026-05-12
|
0 / 40
baseline
|
|
10 prompts × 4 engines "best AI visibility audit", "Profound alternative", "GEO agency for SaaS" + 7 more |
post pending · published friday |
| week 2 onwards, populated every monday | ||||
raw csv: /data/self-audit-runs/2026-05-12-baseline.csv (link added when first run completes)
methodology
why this exists
we sell an AI visibility audit. if we cannot make ourselves visible, why would you trust us with your brand? this page is the proof-of-work. every monday we get a new score, and every friday we publish the post that explains what we did about it.
if by month 3 we are still at 0/40, the whole pitch falls apart and you should ask for a refund. that's the deal.